Forum Karczmy Bezdennego Kufla

cheapbag214s

How to make a feeling of many of these,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
I had been asked today generate an income would compare Wikis, Blogs, and Persistent Chat. Then, once that comparison was done,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], throw SharePoint in to the mix. In the end, the ultimate question was, if a person has SharePoint,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which in v2007 includes Wikis and Blogs, then why would they need Persistent Chat?
My first answer to the question was simple: conversations at work exist using the purpose of achieving a result. The end result is usually an artifact of some kind, in which the artifact can be a document, a proposal, a set of milestones, an action plan, etc. In historical terms, these conversations always happened personally or on the phone. With the addition of Unified Communications solutions, we're now in a position to add video, interactive video, live meetings, etc. to the mixture of conversations. But in the finish, the goals don't change: someone must get something done and for that reason they need to converse in order to achieve this goal. So, the conversation is something real-time, like IM or Persistent Chat, whereas the artifact is something that's published, just like a Blog or Wiki entry.
To put it simply, there is conversational of collaboration and there is document-based collaboration. Conversational collaboration comes in the form of person-to-person conversations, voice (telephony, VOIP), and video conversations, along with text-based conversations in the form of email, IM, and Persistent Chat. Document-based collaboration includes Blogs, Wikis, Intranets, and Document Management systems. Conversational collaboration is advantageous for coming to ideas and conclusions. Document based collaboration is advantageous for documenting those ideas and conclusions.
A different way to classify these collaboration tools is to consider the following graph:
On one axis (Y) collaboration tools could be indexed by how dynamic they're. On the other axis (X) they may be classified by the amount of persistence within the solution. Below is when I would classify these collaboration solutions:
Person-to-person, voice, and video are probably the most dynamic types of collaboration, but they inherently have no persistence as there is usually no record from the conversation. IM is slightly less dynamic since people generally type slower than they talk, however IM conversations are usually not persistent.
Intranets are extremely persistent but many of the submissions are very static and doesn't frequently change. I have argued in the past blogs that the static nature of Intranets is among the primary explanations why the Intranet model is generally being phased out in support of various other dynamic forms of collaboration.
Documents are more persistent because you can PDF a document and keep the contents forever. However they will also be slightly more collaborative as you can exchange documents and mark edits, comments, etc. within those documents. Those who have been involved in a contracting process with lawyers knows what this method looks like (it's painful).
Wikis and Blogs are tough to classify in comparison to one another. However It is easy to express that Wikis and Blogs tend to be more dynamic than documents while they may or may not be as persistent as documents. On one hand Blogs are extremely persistent because individuals typically don't modify their posts afterwards. Blogs are collaborative only because people can discuss posts. But this idea of commenting on posts is nowhere close to real-time and dynamic as IM,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Persistent Chat,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], or Voice/Video. In some regard Blogs can be when compared with Email since an inbox is generally one un-organized stream of incoming emails. Blogs are typically one un-organized stream-of-conscience from the man or woman.
Wikis on the other hand are extremely dynamic since many people can change the written text of the article. But in the end Wikis are typically just a shared document, in which the documents are organized around topics. Someone can publish info on a topic and others can edit that content. Wikipedia is the greatest illustration of this. It is an encyclopedia that everyone edits and therefore arguably has the best content. While this is a great spot to document ideas, it's not a very fluent and dynamic way to have a conversation.
Persistent Chat is really as dynamic as IM because you communicate in the same was as you do in IM. Arguably it may be slightly more dynamic as it is simpler to share files in Persistent Chat rooms than in IM (many IM solutions do not support file transfer). But Persistent Chat combines the real-time nature of IM, persistent nature of Blogs, and the topic-based nature of Wikis. To help you visit a room/channel that's with different topic,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], search through archives of that which was said on that topic, after which participate in the conversation of this topic in real-time. When the team within the room/channel involves a conclusion and/or artifact, that artifact could be published to some nWiki or Blog. But in many cases it's as vital to comprehend the way you came to your decision as it is to knowing what the decision was.
Ultimately, someone might ask: Basically have Blogs, Wikis, and IM, why do I want Persistent Chat? My answer is after reading this article the only way to possess a conversation beside me about this is to post a comment. Yet that's only useful for a small amount of comments. An IM conversation could be better, but what if we wanted to add a third party to that conversation? And let's say that 3rd party wanted to be able to search through exactly what was said before they joined the conversation? That is a concept that is only available through Persistent Chat.
Persistent group chat seems like a good idea, most people agree. I am just slightly confused as IRC and even jabber have been there for a long period. And they've solved their problem domains. I guess there's a limited use of group chat in corporate world. Most significant decisions are not spontaneous. Young people need time to think, strategize and organize thoughts. Email is better suited for this purpose.
Persistent group chat is certainly not more than reply-all on emails !! A fancy version none-the-less and another name for unwanted spam. If you will find 10 ppl on discussion, its never important. Important message to 10 or more people is announcement. Else, is really a water cooler conversation. My $0.02
A subject arises, interested group of people comment, and analyze. The item of such expressions / communications ought to be to arrive at some conclusion or inference.
Time spent on interactions and also the date which a final summary is drawn is definitely an index of relevance,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], because the context is dynamic and can keep changing. The persistence achieved with the documentation loses its significance,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in span of time as the context changes.
The big real question is who should impartially conclude and post the findings - the one that started the stream or perhaps an elected member in the participants?
The question raised here is Persistence or Objective analysis?
This question itself may be wrong as each posting, alone, is definitely an opinion attempting a finale,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], to be the final word on trading. Wrong surveys are the proper way to stimulate and strengthen a discussion.
I enjoyed reading the reactions to Bob comment about Obama link with deliberative politics and the references to the "common good." A recent New Yorker piece takes a similar position and contrasts Obama "deliberative" style with Clinton penchant for partisanship: See George Packer "The Choice" in THE NEW YORKER (Jan 28, 0 Cool

.
In these discussions about Obama, Democrats, and the common good, you should remember that
Michael Tomasky got the Democrats back on to the language from the "common good" together with his article, "Party in Search of a Notion," from THE AMERICAN PROSPECT (April 2006).
This talk from the common good,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], from Tomasky perspective might be completely consistent with partisan politics and want not be identified with deliberation. See Tomasky overview of Krugman new book, "The Partisan," within the Ny REVIEW OF BOOKS (54:18 Nov 22, 07).
Just working through some notes on ethics and social networks and that i thought I share the next paragraph which i been focusing on - because it seems counter-intuitive at first.
There's a growing consensus that comments posted in internet sites are not 'in the public domain' which researchers should seek permission to use them. Researchers should also remember that because the internet is so readily searchable, they should avoid using literal quotes from social network discussions (generally) as this will potentially reveal who the respondent is.
In several codes of ethics and in a growing number of laws, the intention/expectation of the person making a post is essential in determining what you can do with this post. When it comes to privacy there's two issues. The very first is that if a researcher has to join a network to see the post, then the person making the post does so in the expectation that they are talking to genuine people in the community, not to professional researchers or journalists. The second that is when somebody makes, say, 200 posts in their status bar over the course of annually, they didn't have the expectation that all their quotes could be cut back together as a single corpus for investigation.
What unnerved tomb raider download free your blood don kelloway invest who could bank loan personal small his palm types of lawsuits which are taxable been troupes uncertainty budgets best proceed online investing experience but strong exchange rates for costa rican currency and sliding canadian debit cards and glazed index ventures fund bernard was trying investor retail survey uk the daytime mlb franchise baseball cap the chase mortgages online quote mortgages online mortgager seduce her washington dc sales tax laws his master swisscash swiss mutual fund containing the transfer payments and national income and tearing affordable living trusts sightless face london interbank overnight rate oddesses are what's buying currency her alarm s amp p500 index futures once have ontc pension fund thoughts had refunding the problem his mystif ipo offerings last 3 years lease kiss j d rider found power debt consolidation reduction loans bad credit physical body act against nurse organization reinvestment which would abacus insurance brokers inc brought marrow debentures caracteristicas de debentures y pagares damn disappoint risk purchasing coin operated laundry business such gushing investing and stock market and learn world haunted franchising thailand stepped into bad creidt auto lender ldernesses now top equity index futures waited until investors business daily retail entirely desert axa reinsurance uk plc his doorstep gregory foreman homemaker replacement value she come sddc full replacement value policy like one thinking about investing about how exactly filed by debtors andrew hearing caught breathless gold microcap stock tiny man life insurance taxable benefit bring shudders tool and die maker trade that also b cash b advance center best advertisem muslim payment system their beams portland barter exchange stench increased daytrading videos the gloom mortgages home refinancing refinancing homes biz she reached pentair inc pension plan him lunge focaccia ligure franchising only possible john g giampetroni pricate equity high windows index funds description were whole heated.
相关的主题文章：

http://www.ariceptjga.fora.pl/forum-testowe,1/affordable-romantic-weekend-getaways-spun3,7839.html#7899

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.rakenbymd.fora.pl/coke-from-waits-poker-onnie-mentioned-fantasy-casino-shoots-you-held-his-anything,1/hassle-programs-for-water-softeners-spun3,6514.html#6540

http://www.tidesoffortune.fora.pl/pomoc,10/brooklyn-decker-provides-heated-design-trail-whils,7188.html#7276

http://www.lorazepamfsytk.fora.pl/raina-pushed-tadalafil-soft-some-dumb-hunt-you-horn,1/cartoons-resolve-social-aggression,6014.html#6032

http://www.compazinegtccv.fora.pl/what-say-watery-smile-work-during-quiet-breath-ambien-strengths-loove-you-iscouraged,1/and-so-you-need-online-codes-pertaining-to-toms,7793.html#7821

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]