Forum Karczmy Bezdennego Kufla

cheapbag214s

year of service suggesting poor quality of hire. A majority of organizations’ cost of turnover estimates range from 1/2 to 1-1/2 times a departing employee’s salary depending on their level, tenure, and experience. The cost of losing these employees has significant impact to organizations and includes recruiter time and expenses, lost time for the new hires work team to interview and train the new hire, and on-boarding and orientation costs among others.Keeping employees on the job- Organizations seem to be retaining what they can of their current workforce. The percentage of employees leaving the organization involuntarily (e.g.,http://www.smislam.com/, layoff, dismissal, death) has decreased four years in a row to its current rate of 3.2% – a drop of 36% since 2003.Graying of the WorkforceThe percentage of employees eligible for retirement in the next five years increased to 22% in 2006 – an increase of more than 25% in the last two years alone.A Buyers’ (Employee) MarketOffer acceptance rates have decreased each year since 2003 and at 91% are at their lowest rate since the dot com bubble of 2000. Employees are finding more opportunities in the job market each year and that retiring employees are adding to the talent shortage.Voluntary separation rates remained consistent in 2005 (10.5%) and 2006 (10.4%). However, one in ten employees voluntarily left their employers in 2006 and has generally been on the rise since 2003 with a compound annual growth rate of 4.3%.#1 Operating ExpenseFor the past four years, the single largest expense for organizations has been workforce compensation and benefit costs,[url=http://www.smislam.com/]Christian Louboutin Men[/url], accounting for over 35% of operating expenses.War in Black and White. And Gray.Maybe the most significant piece of video to come out this week was not on television—not originally—but from the website wikileaks.org. The video, which TIME’s Mark Thompson analyzes here, shows the pilot’s-eye view as, in July 2007, a U.S. Apache helicopter in Baghdad shot and killed a Reuters journalist, his driver and several nearby people and wounded others including two children. Reuters had attempted to get the video from the Pentagon; the Wikileaks site says it received it from a military whistleblower.The video is embedded above (warning—it is graphic). I’m not going to try to rule on whether the shooting was error, understandable, or something far more egregious. (Wikileaks does editorialize on it, having posted it at the site collateralmurder.com.) But it is a stark reminder of the dangers and costs of war, and how little we’ve really seen of them in the last decade.And it seems to be another example of how even straight documentary footage is still subject for argument and fodder for very different conclusions.One argument about showing raw combat footage—both for and against—is that it will have a single,[url=http://www.smislam.com/]Cheap Christian Louboutin[/url], predictable effect on public opinion. Usually the assumption is that (often with Vietnam cited as evidence) it will turn the audience against a given war. Not always, though: see the decision by FDR during WWII to release film from the Marine battle at Tarawa to give the American public an idea of the sacrifices that fighting men were making.I don’t know if was ever really true that footage of war death moved public opinion in a predictable direction. But if it was ever true, it must be even less so now, as the viral spread of video and the endless outlets for debate make any raw material subject to argument and politicization. Already you can look at the comments at a site like Mediaite (not to mention all the ones at YouTube) and see that people are capable of seeing the same chilling footage and drawing opposite conclusions.I’m not saying this is a good or a bad thing, but it’s a fact of our public discourse now. And to me it’s only more reason that,[url=http://www.smislam.com/]Christian Louboutin Discount[/url], when our country goes to war, we have access to more, not less, first-hand images of the consequences. In a contentious era, the fog of war exists not just on the battlefield but on the home front. At least with
相关的主题文章：