Forum Karczmy Bezdennego Kufla

wlkleo00jah

For some reason you cannot acne free in 3 days like you imagined? There is something about acne free in 3 days that has people thinking.
American auto makers haven’t ever given the US [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] people an opportunity to acquire a fuel-efficient car, despite the world having beem embroiled in oil wars and being severely polluted. The question comes up: how many Americans would have welcomed the option of getting a car with good gas mileage but weren’t ever offered it? Could it be time to recover those dumped designs and, again, start building those vehicles that were once built a long time ago?
It’s fairly shocking that this wasn’t the only GM [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] prototype that was built, only to be thrown out later. A number of these were the 1982 GM Lean Machine which did 80 [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] miles per gallon, and the GM Ultralite which managed to do 100 mpg. GM seemed to be offering cars to the buying public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while Honda was getting 50 mpg with their Civic VX, but right then GM already covertly had cars doing 100 miles per gallon. If cars that were able to do 100 miles per gallon had already been developed way back then, why is it that such cars are not being sold today?
Power economy was [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] viewed as a significant factor in their selection of a new car by [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] a [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] minimum of 1/3 of buyers in America. Given the preoccupation today with air pollution, global warming and America’s dependence on overseas sources of oil, it’s actually shocking to learn that as long ago as 1992 a car that got 100 miles to the gallon was built by General Motors. An additional vehicle, the GM TPC, which looked a lot like the Geo Metro, weighed only 1000 pounds and would get 75 miles per gallon. Balanced growth of the vehicle, the engine of which had 3 cylinders, was dropped because, in [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] order to meet American safety standards, it had to be reinforced which added 200 pounds to its weight.
Another puzzling thing is that many companies, while selling fuel-eficient vehicles in foreign countries, are selling traditional gas guzzlers in the US. Vehicles that achieve more than 70 mpg have been purchased in Europe and Japan for a number of years. A case in point of a car / truck never offered in the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. Honda introduced to the US sector in 2007, a car called the Fit, but known as the Jazz in other parts of the world. The Jazz in Japan has ways to increase fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the Fit doesn’t even contain a smaller engine as an option.
Auto manufacturers in the united states explain to their public that they create big autos because they, the public, love big autos. [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] Not surprisingly they earn big money on SUVs, and [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] almost nothing on a small two-person commuter. American residents have been brainwashed with advertisements to believe [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] that they just simply must have the latest and largest bundu basher. Fuel-saving alternatives from the big companies are uncommon, so it’s pretty easy to deduce where their motivations lay. The leader in fuel economy could have been General Motors, but they opt to remain the [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] leader in SUVs instead. The many other car makers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, and then denied [link widoczny dla zalogowanych] them to Americans.
相关的主题文章:

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]